From the archives: Film

Or, if you'd prefer, return to the most recent posts.


More than just moving pictures

Sunday, 28 September 2003 — 8:57pm | Animation, Film

My praise for the Metro Cinema may become a fairly regular feature of this weblog. Tonight they presented a reel of the winning entries from this year’s Ottawa International Animation Festival.

The amount of pure, sweet creativity thrust upon me tonight was so staggering that describing my individual reactions to each of the eleven shorts is quite an unmanageable affair. There were two delightfully quirky (read: weird) films by National Film Board staple Chris Hinton, “Flux” and “Twang”, which both push the limits of what sequential drawings on paper can do in terms of narrative storytelling. The winner of Most Hilarious Film, “How Democracy Actually Works”, provoked exactly that reaction from the audience. I will never look at public washrooms the same way again.

The NSPCC-commissioned short, “Cartoon”, was one entry I’d seen before in the 2002 Cannes Film Festival’s “World’s Best Commercials” reel. To this day it remains one of the most shocking thirty seconds of mixed media I’ve seen; in fact, I thought of it again a week ago when I read this Economist article about how child abuse is still tolerated in France. It depicts a father smacking around a cartoon child who reacts with all the eye-rolling, head-spinning wackiness of Wile E. Coyote. At one point the child tumbles down the stairs; “Real children don’t bounce back,” we’re then told, as it pans over to reveal a real boy lying at the foot of the steps.

My faith in modern television programming was also renewed by an episode of Samurai Jack (“Jack and the Blind Archers”), winner of Best Television Series, which I had never before seen. In all my years of bemoaning the demise of worthwhile television cartoons, it appears that all the creativity in the industry had been monopolized by this particular show and its creator, Genndy Tartakovsky. Suddenly, my faith in Tartakovsky’s upcoming Clone Wars project – about which I once had serious doubts – has been renewed. They picked exactly the right man to do a Star Wars spinoff. Of course, I will have to see it first before I comment further.

The Norwegian winner of Best Film Made for Children, Anita Killi’s “The Hedge of Thorns”, was probably my favourite of the evening. It depicts a world of personified bunnies, where a boy wishes only to play with a girl across the creek, but one day finds in place of the creek an endless line of barbed wire. As far as tackling the subject of war goes, it surpasses most feature films that see release in the multiplex nowadays.

I should really stop here before I get carried away. If the Ottawa reel plays anywhere near you, I unreservedly recommend that you go see it.

Annotations (1)


Scrabylon to screen in Calgary

Wednesday, 17 September 2003 — 8:38pm | Film, Scrabble

I am now officially torn.

Given that I’m missing this year’s Grant Davy’s in-house debate tournament because of the Western Canadian Scrabble Championships, I guess it’s only fair that I give up something Scrabble-related for debate. This looks to happen, as the Scott Petersen documentary Scrabylon is screening at the Calgary International Film Festival on Saturday, 27 September – and that’s when UADS is running the Lois Hole high school tournament.

If you are down in Calgary, please go see this film and tell me how it is. I just know I’m missing out here.

Annotations (0)


There are two kinds of men…

Monday, 15 September 2003 — 10:31pm | Film, Full reviews

Those with loaded guns, and those who dig – dig a certain movie, that is.

Yes, I know. I’m behind on my movie reviews. I usually don’t move ahead until I’m all caught up but tonight’s cinematic experience cannot go that long without comment. Here’s my capsule attempt to catch up on what I’ve seen in theatres lately: Seabiscuit is very much worth your time; Tomb Raider: The Cradle of Life is not worth your time at all, but at least it’s a real movie, unlike its eyesore of a predecessor; Whale Rider was a refreshing break from multiplex fare; and American Splendor, albeit imperfect, is in many ways a shining example of what a comic book movie should be.

Good. Now let’s move on.

One of Edmonton’s redeeming qualities – in fact, one so redeeming that it can be said to be clearly to the city’s credit – is a little place called the Metro Cinema down at the Citadel. After missing the screenings earlier this weekend for various reasons, I finally straightened out my priorities and decided that no degree of homework or studying could justify missing a theatrical absorption of Sergio Leone’s masterpiece Il Buono, Il Brutto, Il Cattivo – better known as The Good, the Bad and the Ugly.

I see little need to speak of the film itself. It is the best Western of all time, period. Some will point to The Searchers, the first two films in the Man With No Name trilogy or Unforgiven, and those claims are not without merit; but it was The Good, the Bad and the Ugly that served as the pinnacle of the genre, the one Western that became a historical epic. Certainly it lacks Unforgiven‘s emotional depth, but one should consider that Eastwood’s tribute to the genre that made him was directly spawned from his earlier work in the spaghettis. Leone’s film is the genre’s seminal exploration of immorality and greed, and if you haven’t seen it, drop what you are doing and see it right now. In the meantime, I will elaborate on tonight’s screening itself.

For the most part, the transfer was almost as pristine as the DVD, full of that high-contrast Technicolor look and all the vibrance it brings. The print quality was not always consistent, and degradation was noticeable in some shots, but aside from that minor complaint the experience was immersive. There really is nothing like seeing Clint Eastwood’s trademark Man With No Name trudge through the desert, a broken man on the edge of death, sunburnt and blistered to all hell, in the context of a big screen and an audience full of fellow film lovers such as myself who knew every shot in the piece, but never quite so intimately. The scene where Blondie and Tuco take on Angel Eyes’ goons amidst the shelling of an abandoned town is a magnified thrill. In a darkened theatre, the final shootout has an aura of suspense much greater than how it looks on a television set. As it cuts from eyes to holster to holster to eyes, it holds the audience captive. There are no distractions from Leone’s patient strokes, so effective in the face of the paradigm of rapidity that envelops today’s action flicks.

But there’s more.

When I went to the cinema tonight, what I didn’t know was that they were showing the three-hour Extended English Edition that I had only heard about in rumours about a reissued DVD.

As the first of the re-inserted scenes appeared – Tuco talking to a dead chicken before he rounds up the gang with which he takes on Blondie in the inn – the audience was in shock. There are some other transitional sequences, including a critical one that shows how Angel Eyes found out about the prison camp on his search for Bill Carson. This, and some of the other scenes, are present on the current DVD but only with the Italian dialogue track. There are others that are not – not just entire scenes, but little nuances here and there that were never in the original. The best one is a lengthier sequence that shows how the One-Armed Man identified Tuco and stalked him, as the latter readied a bath – a welcome prelude to the classic “Shoot, don’t talk” scene.

However, the Extended cut in its current state is a far cry from being a permanent and definitive replacement for the theatrical version to which we are all used, unlike similar extended incarnations of films such as Almost Famous, Blade Runner and The Fellowship of the Ring. The reason is that the re-inserted scenes lack a certain polish. It is most evident in the ADR work; simply put, a good number of the English dubs are poorly done and make the scenes look out of place with the rest of the movie.

The most intrusive of the lot is Tuco, who has most of the lines in the added sequences. Eli Wallach re-dubbed his lines himself, but his voice has aged considerably, and is significantly croakier than how Tuco sounds in the rest of the movie. A more rigorous sound editing process might have ironed it out, and I hope that is done before this cut sees a Region 1 DVD release. Eastwood fares a little better; he has few new lines, but only a handful of them have the gruffer sound of the Eastwood of today. As for the other voice actors who dubbed over the Italian, there are some major synchronization issues that were never present in the original film despite its having Italian extras dubbed over as well.

Despite the fact that some of the restored sequences do not fit into the movie as well as they could, watching this film in a cinema setting was something to be glad about. Unfortunately, today was its last day at the Metro; however, if it ever pops up anywhere accessible, do not miss it by any means.

Annotations (0)


The textbook movie release plan

Friday, 22 August 2003 — 8:53am | Film

TheOneRing.net has a transcript from Variety detailing New Line Cinema’s plan to re-release The Fellowship of the Ring and The Two Towers prior to the 17 December launch of The Return of the King. Excerpt:

Starting the week of Dec. 5, the extended DVD cut of “Fellowship of the Ring” will be released in some 100 or so theaters in the U.S. and in 20 theaters in Canada.

Then, the week of Dec. 12, sequel “Two Towers” will unspool, just a month after having preemed on DVD, leading up to a worldwide Dec. 16 daylong marathon, during which all three films will be shown back-to-back. Exhib guidelines call for a 3 p.m. showing of “Fellowship” followed by a 7 p.m. screening of “Two Towers” and then an 11 p.m. screening of “Return of the King,” which will carry over into Dec. 17 — the day of its global release.

But here’s the kicker: we’re talking Extended Editions, folks – the full DVD cuts of the first two. Tickets to the 16 December marathon are going to be a nightmare, so consider this an early heads-up.

Annotations (0)


Everybody’s favourite mid-year guessing game

Thursday, 14 August 2003 — 2:44pm | Film, Oscars

We’re at the halfway mark to the Oscars and the crapshoot’s already begun. Hopefully someone, somewhere will score higher than three-for-five in the big categories, but in recent years this has only happened in the absurdly predictable 2002, which had most bettors pegging all five of the eventual Best Picture nominees in various permutations when the 2001 awards were hardly out of the gate.

David Poland, one of the most dependable and reputable critics in the industry today, is recognizing the guaranteed entry – The Return of the King – and making two daring stabs at naming the other locks. The first is Peter Weir’s Master and Commander. I find it interesting that Fox is already touting the Russell Crowe vehicle as their historical epic flagship in the Academy regatta. From the teaser trailer it looks to be playing it safe and conventional, and does not at all come off as the great Napoleonic-era film of its time, which it needs to be if it is aiming that high. (Come to think of it, is there a great Napoleonic-era film yet?)

This year, aside from Master and Commander, the forecast shows two other bids for the Obligatory Period-Film Slot in The Last Samurai and Cold Mountain. Of the three, it is in Mountain that my flag of prognostication is firmly planted. It is impossible to tell until these films actually see release, of course, and I do hope that all three of these do as well as promised. Note the omission of The Alamo; let’s just say it would be a surprise if it actually turns out to be good.

Poland’s other prediction is Alejandro Gonzalez Innaritu’s 21 Grams, which is if anything, an unconventional guess. We’ll know for sure by the end of the Toronto Film Festival. There is little I can say about it, as I have never watched Amores Perros or any other Innaritu film.

The other prediction making the rounds, which Poland covers briefly, is that Seabiscuit and Finding Nemo will probably be shafted; I tend to agree. The former is in the Road to Perdition slot – a refined, conventional period film released in July that slowly drops from a clear first place to an even clearer sixth over the course of half a year. The latter is this year’s Minority Report – near-unanimous praise from both critics and audiences, but severely hurt by what it is. In Nemo‘s case, it is clearly the very best film of the year thus far beyond any comparison, but alas, it is animated. On the other hand, if one film deserves to be the only animated film to be nominated for Best Picture other than the similarly deserving Beauty and the Beast, this is the one. In my opinion, Finding Nemo should ideally win Best Picture unless it comes up against the next Lawrence of Arabia.

Naturally, by some cosmic convergence, this is the year that the next Lawrence of Arabia is finally released in full, with the completion of The Lord of the Rings. The Return of the King must win this year, period. It makes one weep for Nemo, but if anything should upstage the fish movie, it should be the recognition of the defining film of this generation.

Aside from David Poland’s predictions, last year’s prediction ace Mark Bakalor has his charts up and running, and is naming four of the films I have already mentioned – The Return of the King, Cold Mountain, The Last Samurai and Seabiscuit – plus The House of Sand and Fog, the small-film guess. Like everyone else, Bakalor will probably shuffle his list like a rack of Scrabble tiles in the coming months. Kris Tapley has also put together his mid-season bets, identical to Bakalor’s if you swap Samurai with Master and Commander.

The unfortunate thing is that of the early predictions, one almost certainly underperforms upon release. This would be a real shame, as many of them sound like they have so much potential.

Annotations (1)


« Back to the Future (newer posts) | A Link to the Past (older posts) »